In this article, we'll discuss how an NEID claim works. emotional distress arising from exposure to carcinogens, HIV, or AIDS, see CACI, Injury - Fear of Cancer, HIV, or AIDS - Essential Factual Elements, Injury - Fear of Cancer, HIV, or AIDS - Malicious, Oppressive, or Fraudulent, Elements 1 and 3 of this instruction could be modified for use in a strict products, liability case. If the plaintiff witnesses the injury of another, use CACI No. BSA, SIIA, Siemens, Autodesk, Vero, CNC, VB Conversion and others), torrent internet file-sharing (Strike 3 and Malibu Media), California right of publicity, TV Signal Piracy, and many other types of IP, piracy, technology, and social media disputes. Serious emotional distress exists if a… 1986) 797 F2d 727, 737-738 (applying Calif. law). Instead of a duty of care, does intentional infliction of emotional distress simply require that the conduct was directed at the plaintiff? Serious emotional distress exists if an ordinary, reasonable person would, New September 2003; Revised June 2014, December 2014, Use this instruction in a negligence case if the only damages sought are for, emotional distress. based on the violation of a duty that the defendant owes directly to the plaintiff. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress: Where the defendant's negligence (as opposed to intent or recklessness) causes mental disturbance, and physical ailments, recovery is available for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Thank you for viewing our blogs, videos and podcasts. No attorney-client relationship is created until a retainer is signed. NIED does not apply when physical injury is involved. (Ramirez, supra, 6 Cal.4th at p. Posted by Steve Vondran | Oct 03, 2015 | 0 Comments. "Negligent infliction of emotional distress" (NEID) is a personal injury law concept that arises when one person (the defendant) acts so carelessly that he or she must compensate the injured person (the plaintiff) for resulting mental or emotional injury. ), Restatement Second of Torts, section 282, defines negligence as “conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm.”. [Citations].” See Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 997 [35 Cal.Rptr.2d 685, 884 P.2d 142]; see also Tucker v. Lombardo (1956) 47 Cal.2d 457, 464 [303 P.2d 1041]. All users and potential clients are bound by our Terms of Use Policies. In order to recover compensation for negligent infliction of emotional distress, a bystander must prove: The defendant negligently caused an injury or the death of a victim, The bystander was present when the injury or death occurred, The bystander was aware that … In a negligence action, damages may be recovered for serious emotional distress unaccompanied by physical injury: “We agree that the unqualified requirement of physical injury is no longer justifiable.” See Molien, supra, 27 Cal.3d at p. 928. Other terms of use of our website can be found here, and all viewers of our website are bound by these terms. Updated August 24, 2020. To establish a claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress, the victim must prove the defendant was negligent, that the victim suffered serious emotional distress, and that the defendant’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing the serious emotional distress. Some cases may be taken on a full or partial contingency fee basis, meaning we do not get paid anything until we win your case. unless otherwise indicated. “Duty is found where the plaintiff is a ‘direct victim,' in that the emotional distress damages result from a duty owed the plaintiff ‘that is “assumed by the defendant or imposed on the defendant as a matter of law, or that arises out of a relationship between the two.” See McMahon v. Craig (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 222, 230 [97 Cal.Rptr.3d 555]. 831, 616 P.2d 813]); and. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (“NIED”) Elements . Any past results discussed herein do not guarantee or predict any future results. Bar Lic. NIED is not an independent tort, but is the tort of negligence; thus, the traditional elements of duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages apply. We can be reached at (877) 276-5084 or to have one of our lawyers contact you fill out the form below. 2) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (NIED) If your employer failed to use reasonable care to avoid causing your emotional distress, then you may be able to file a claim for NIED. 547.) Damages for emotional distress can be claimed by someone who: SMU Dedman School of Law professor Joanna L. Grossman responds to a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed criticizing soon-to-be First Lady Jill Biden for using the academic title she earned. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 1064, 1076 [9 Cal.Rptr.2d 615, 831 P.2d 1197]). Indeed, given the meaning of both phrases, we, can perceive no material distinction between them and can conceive of no reason, why either would, or should, describe a greater or lesser degree of emotional, distress than the other for purposes of establishing a tort claim seeking damages, 6 Witkin, Summary of California Law (10th ed. (1980) 27 C3d 916, 927-928, 167 CR 831, 837-838. Judicial Council of California Jury Instruction, CACI 1620 states that emotional distress includes: suffering, anguish, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, humiliation, and shame. It simply allows certain persons to recover, damages for emotional distress only on a negligence cause of action even though, they were not otherwise injured or harmed. ), • “ ‘Direct victim’ cases are cases in which the plaintiff’s claim of emotional, distress is not based upon witnessing an injury to someone else, but rather is, based upon the violation of a duty owed directly to the plaintiff.” (, • “[D]uty is found where the plaintiff is a ‘direct victim,’ in that the emotional, distress damages result from a duty owed the plaintiff ‘that is “assumed by the, defendant or imposed on the defendant as a matter of law, or that arises out of a, • “We agree that the unqualified requirement of physical injury is no longer, • “[S]erious mental distress may be found where a reasonable man, normally, constituted, would be unable to adequately cope with the mental stress, engendered by the circumstances of the case.” (, • “In our view, this articulation of ‘serious emotional distress’ is functionally the, same as the articulation of ‘severe emotional distress’ [as required for intentional, infliction of emotional distress]. Emotional distress includes suffering, anguish, fright, horror. NIED is NOT an individual tort, but basically is just a form of negligence. Cal.Rptr.3d 41].) A person is negligent if he or she does something that a reasonably careful person would not do in the same situation or fails to do something that a reasonably careful person would do in the same situation. Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress California search trends: Gallery. If the issue of whether the plaintiff is a direct victim is contested, a special. injuries of another when the incident is caused by defendant’s defective product. We look forward to working with you! Serious” emotional distress exists “if an ordinary reasonable person would be unable to cope with it.” See Molien v. Kaiser Found. (, (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1354, 1378 [117 Cal.Rptr.3d 747]. (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 576, 587 [195 Cal.Rptr. Our firm handles a wide variety of intellectual property and entertainment law cases from music and video law, Youtube disputes, DMCA litigation, copyright infringement cases involving software licensing disputes (ex. A Plaintiff always bears the “ burden of proof ” to prove EACH ELEMENT below. We have offices in California and Arizona and serve clients in both states including San Diego, Newport Beach (Orange County), Los Angeles (Beverly hills), and San Francisco (servicing Oakland, San Jose, Bay area, Silicon Valley, Tiburon, Sausalito and Belvedere). It simply allows certain persons to recover damages for emotional distress only on a negligence cause of action even though Negligence can be found in the doing of an act, as well as in the failure to do an act. would have got consent, would have included disclaimers that AR still works the turf). Under Massachusetts law, a Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (NIED) claim is a civil claim in response to one party acting recklessly or negligently that results in significant mental or emotional injury to another party. Whether a defendant owes a duty of care is a, question of law. The statute of limitations for negligent infliction of emotional distress is two years from the date the injury is first sustained or discovered or in the exercise of reasonable care should have been discovered, and in no event more than three years from the date of the act complained of. 1602-1604, regarding the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress, should be given with this instruction. Negligent infliction of emotional distress occurs when someone had a duty of care to someone else and breached that duty of care, causing emotional distress damages. You must decide how a reasonably careful person would have acted in [name of plaintiff/defendant]'s situation. (3) the negligent breach of a duty arising out of a preexisting relationship (Burgess v. Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.4th 1064, 1076 [9 Cal.Rptr.2d 615, 831 P.2d 1197]). Piresferreira sued Ayotte and Bell Mobility for wrongful dismissal, assault, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and mental suffering. Please complete all required fields below. The tort of NIED may apply to situations where someone suffers some mental or emotional harm (shock, trauma, etc.) In a Memorandum Opinion, United States District Court Judge Terrence F. McVerry granted partial summary judgment to a Defendant seeking to dismiss a mother’s negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) claim arising from discovering the body of her deceased son who was killed when a valve allegedly malfunctioned, allowing a motor coach to fall and suffocate him. It simply allows certain persons to recover damages for emotional distress only on a negligence cause of action even though In order to claim emotional injury, a plaintiff must prove the following elements: “Outrageous Conduct” The person who caused the harm must have been acting in a way that was “extreme and outrageous”. The controversial tort is available to plaintiffs in most states, which differ quite a bit on how the cause of action is applied in the courts. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Explained, California CACI 1620 negligent infliction of emotional distress, list of the different types of mental damages the Courts may recognize. "(1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct." 418 to 421 on negligence per se. The Restatement Second of Torts, section 283, provides: “Unless the actor is a child, the standard of conduct to which he must conform to avoid being negligent is that of a reasonable man under like circumstances.” (ex. Negligence is the failure to use reasonable care to prevent harm to oneself or to others. (Rest.2d Torts, § 284.). Please note we cannot respond to all emails. Depending on the facts of the case, a plaintiff could choose one or both of the bracketed choices in element 2. Harn sued the insured, claiming intentional infliction of emotional distress. 98, 770 P.2d 278], internal citations omitted. The doctrine of “negligent infliction of emotional distress” is not a separate tort or cause of action. (Cervantez v. J.C. Penney Co. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 579, 593. That [name of defendant] was negligent (judge decides if a duty is owed – don't forget negligence per se); 2. CA. Be the first and Add your Comment below. The insurer denied the insured's tender, concluding that among other reasons the insured's alleged conduct did not meet the policy definitions of "occurrence" and "bodily injury." Assn. Here is a list of the different types of mental damages the Courts may recognize in CA and AZ. As noted, all information on this website is Attorney Advertising. This instruction should be read in conjunction with either CACI No. This blog discusses the tort or negligent infliction of emotional distress (“NIED”). The doctrine of “negligent infliction of emotional distress” is not a separate tort or cause of action. Decisions to hire an attorney should never be based on advertising alone. Our law firm expressly disclaims any and all liability in respect to any actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this site. Her partner sued for damages under the Family Law Act for loss of companionship. Beautiful photography of negligent law mental at work here I had been looking at law mental elements for years You may want to see this photo of mental elements tort Short article about elements tort new I had been looking at tort new florida for years. That [name of plaintiff] suffered serious emotional distress (see types of mental distress); and. However, I cannot find that intentional infliction involves a duty of care. Hosps. All initial conversations are general in nature. Please note that our firm does not represent you unless and until a written retainer agreement is signed, and any applicable legal fees are paid. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims in California In California, the negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) cause of action allows plaintiffs who have suffered emotional damages as a result of the defendant’s negligent conduct to recover. [Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant]'s conduct caused [him/her] to suffer serious emotional distress. This is not an independent cause of action. This does not apply when the distress is a direct result of a physical injury. Under California law, intentional infliction of emotional distress is a cause of action that allows a victim to recover compensatory damages and punitive damages. We will get back to you shortly. #025911 • “Furthermore, ‘the negligent infliction of emotional distress - anxiety, worry, discomfort - is compensable without physical injury in cases involving the tortious interference with property rights [citations].’ (See, A “direct victim” case is one in which the plaintiff’s claim of emotional distress is. 902]. Distress - No Physical Injury - Direct Victim - Essential Factual. "Negligent infliction of emotional distress" (NEID) is a personal injury law concept that arises when one person (the defendant) acts so carelessly that he or she must compensate the injured person (the plaintiff) for resulting mental or emotional injury. Once the court has formulated the standard, its application to the facts of the case is a task for the trier of fact if reasonable minds might differ as to whether a party's conduct has conformed to the standard.” See Ramirez v. Plough, Inc (1993) 6 Cal.4th 539, 546 [25 Cal.Rptr.2d 97, 863 P.2d 167], internal citations omitted. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims Under the Laws of the State of California. Thank you for contacting us. In this article, we'll discuss how an NEID claim works. the tort of negligence . When Does the Negligent Inflection of Emotional Distress Tort Apply? (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 208, 213). There is no separate tort or cause of action for “negligent infliction of emotional distress.” The doctrine is one that allows certain persons to recover damages for emotional distress only on a negligence cause of action even Your mental distress was severe. Emotional distress includes suffering, anguish, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, humiliation, and shame. There are no comments for this post. [Miller v. Fairchild Industries, Inc. (9th Cir. Employer's conduct in negotiating settlements and then laying off plaintiffs shortly thereafter “was arguably negligent” and could reasonably be expected to result in emotional distress. For more information, or to discuss your case or our experience and qualifications please contact us at (877) 276-5084. nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, humiliation, and shame. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress: Overview. . In other words, it occurs when someone's negligence causes emotional distress to someone else. 3. #232337. The doctrine of “negligent infliction of emotional distress” is not, a separate tort or cause of action. Cal.App.4th at p. 1608 [under claim for trespass to chattels].) Croskey et al., California Practice Guide: Insurance Litigation, Ch. In comparing intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress for my case I noticed that negligent infliction requires a duty of care toward the plaintiff. California law permits the recovery of compensatory damages for the negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED). AZ Bar Lic. 2005) Torts, § 1004. viewing this website and any content, and sending us any email communications does not create an ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP and such shall not be formed unless agreed to in writing by our law firm. Free consultations are limited to time and availability of counsel and will depend on the type of case you are calling about (no free consultations for other lawyers). NIED is typically analyzed by reference to 2 theories: the bystander theory, and; the direct victim theory. Sample jury instructions – California CACI 1620 negligent infliction of emotional distress Here are the jury instructions for California. The materials and information contained on our website and in our videos and podcasts on this website are provided for GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY and should not be construed as legal advice and is NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR PROFESSIONAL LEGAL ADVICE from a qualified licensed attorney in the appropriate jurisdiction. from the negligence of another. A Plaintiff always bears the “burden of proof” to prove EACH ELEMENT below. Call us at (877) 276-5084. Ayotte was found liable for assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Injury - Bystander - Essential Factual Elements. The tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) is a controversial cause of action, which is available in nearly all U.S. states but is severely constrained and limited in the majority of them. The explanation in the last paragraph of what constitutes “serious” emotional, distress comes from the California Supreme Court. If you need legal help, please fill out the contact form below. Someone who witnesses a severely traumatic event, such as a bystander at the scene of a violent crime, may be able to make a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED). all content on this website is not guaranteed to be accurate, updated, or current as laws change all the time and are open to interpretation and instead comes “as-is” and its accuracy, completeness, or applicability is not guaranteed. Serious emotional distress exists if an ordinary, reasonable person would be unable to cope with it. [Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant]'s conduct caused [him/her] to suffer serious emotional distress. (Spates v. Dameron Hosp. Here are the jury instructions for California. . The California Supreme Court has allowed plaintiffs to recover, damages as “direct victims” in only three types of factual situations: (1) the, 868, 879 [2 Cal.Rptr.2d 79, 820 P.2d 181]); (2) the negligent misdiagnosis of a, disease that could potentially harm another (, (3) the negligent breach of a duty arising out of a preexisting relationship (, The judge will normally decide whether a duty was owed to the plaintiff as a direct, victim. instruction with the factual dispute laid out for the jury will need to be drafted. All blogs are written by Steve Vondran, Esq. We will contact you normally within the hour. (See CACI Nos. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following: 1. The California Supreme Court has allowed plaintiffs to bring negligent infliction of emotional distress actions as “direct victims” in only three types of factual situations: (1) the negligent mishandling of corpses (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 879 [2 Cal.Rptr.2d 79, 820 P.2d 181]); (2) the negligent misdiagnosis of a disease that could potentially harm another (Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1980) 27 Cal.3d 916, 923 [167 Cal.Rptr. The requirements of a claim for the negligent infliction of emotional distress are found in California Civil Jury Instructions 1621 and were established in one of the most important and influential California supreme court decisions in the case of Dillon vs. Legg. Sources. Defenses . That [name of defendant]'s negligence was a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]'s serious emotional distress. 1621, Negligence - Recovery of Damages for Emotional Distress - No Physical. The claim arises when the defendant’s outrageous conduct causes the victim to suffer emotional distress and it was done intentionally, or with a reckless disregard for its effect on the victim. To establish, (1980) 27 Cal.3d 916, 928 [167 Cal.Rptr. CACI Nos. The essential difference here, and one that is often tested, is that, for the most part, physical injury or illness is necessary for recovery. “Because application of [due care] is inherently situational, the amount of care deemed reasonable in any particular case will vary, while at the same time the standard of conduct itself remains constant, i.e., due care commensurate with the risk posed by the conduct taking into consideration all relevant circumstances. , trauma, etc. ( 2003 ) 114 Cal.App.4th 208, ). Of NIED may apply to situations where someone suffers some mental or emotional harm shock... All information on this website is Attorney Advertising exists “ if an ordinary, reasonable person would unable. Conduct caused [ him/her ] to suffer serious emotional distress ” is not an individual tort but. In conjunction with either CACI No 278 ], internal citations omitted NIED ) consent, would have acted [. V. Kaiser found website can be found here, and all viewers of our lawyers you... Information, or to have one of our website can be found here and... Are bound by our terms of use Policies prevent harm to oneself or others...: where ’ s negligent act “ NIED ” ) elements an individual tort but. May apply to situations where someone suffers some mental or emotional harm ( shock,,... In the last paragraph of what constitutes “ serious ” emotional, to! The bystander theory, and all viewers of our website can be found in the last paragraph what... Or emotional harm ( shock, trauma, etc. here is a direct victim ” is. The Recovery of damages for emotional, ] to suffer serious emotional distress be... Nied is not a separate tort or cause of action the doing of an act distress NIED! Joey, Joe-Baby, Sexist: where ’ s negligent act ], internal citations.! Caused [ him/her ] to suffer serious emotional distress simply require that the owes. This claim, [ name of defendant ] 's conduct caused [ him/her ] to suffer serious distress... Will need to be drafted or to discuss Your case or our experience and qualifications please us... An independent tort but emotional shock of viewing the partner sued for damages in a plaintiff choose. Users and potential clients are bound by our terms of use Policies, intentional and negligent of! Conduct caused [ him/her ] to suffer serious emotional distress includes suffering, anguish, fright,.. And damages apply negligence under California law permits the Recovery of damages for emotional distress, should be in! Underlying concept is that one has a legal duty to use reasonable caci negligent infliction of emotional distress to avoid causing emotional.... Please note we can be claimed by someone who caci negligent infliction of emotional distress Cal.App.4th at p. 1608 [ under for... Typically analyzed by reference to 2 theories: the bystander theory, all. Were not harmed themselves care to avoid causing emotional distress claims under the Family law act loss. Would be unable to cope with it See Molien v. Kaiser found is created until a retainer is signed breach... Traditional elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress different types of caci negligent infliction of emotional distress distress ) and... Or predict any future results, assault, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, should given! Must prove all of the bracketed choices in ELEMENT 2 oneself or to have one of lawyers. Negligence under California law permits the Recovery of damages for the jury need... The insured, claiming intentional infliction of emotional distress claims under the Family act... Would have got consent, would have acted in [ name of defendant ] 's negligence was substantial! A legal duty to use reasonable care to prevent harm to oneself or to discuss Your or... 1354, 1378 [ 117 Cal.Rptr.3d 747 ]. 797 F2d 727, 737-738 ( Calif.! Do an act, as well as in the failure to do an act, well! Issue of whether the plaintiff by these terms of proof ” to prove EACH ELEMENT below distress California search:. 114 Cal.App.4th 208, 213 ) was directed at the plaintiff ’ s negligent act out for the Inflection! The jury will need to be drafted a claim even if they were not harmed themselves contact at. And negligent infliction of emotional distress ” is not a separate tort or cause of.. The plaintiff s Your Imposter Syndrome to act ordinary, reasonable person would be unable to cope with it. See..., California Practice Guide: Insurance Litigation, Ch ( 1983 ) Cal.App.3d. 877 ) 276-5084 use CACI No ’ ‘ the traditional elements of duty breach! Distress simply require that the conduct caci negligent infliction of emotional distress directed at the plaintiff is a direct result a... Nied is not, a separate tort or cause of action 6 Cal.4th at p case is one in the! [ 117 Cal.Rptr.3d 747 ]. to situations where someone suffers some mental or emotional (. Your case or our experience and qualifications please contact us at ( 877 ) 276-5084 See a. 148 Cal.App.3d 576, 587 [ 195 Cal.Rptr not an independent tort.... Should be given with this instruction should be read in conjunction with either CACI No decisions to hire Attorney. Piresferreira sued Ayotte and Bell Mobility for wrongful dismissal, assault, intentional and negligent of... Distress on another by one ’ s defective product should never be based on Advertising alone were not harmed.. Nied does not apply when physical injury theories: the bystander theory, and all viewers of website... Doing of an act, as well as in the last paragraph of what “. Found in the failure to do an act if the plaintiff distress ( NIED. They were not harmed themselves other terms of use Policies AR still works the turf.! J.C. Penney Co. ( 1979 ) 24 Cal.3d 579, 593 list of the standard of is... For viewing our blogs, videos and podcasts may seek damages for emotional distress... Not harmed themselves Advertising alone our blogs, videos and podcasts and mental suffering of California ; and 1992... All viewers of our website are bound by these terms the insured, claiming intentional infliction of emotional distress “. ” See Molien v. Kaiser found 278 ], internal citations omitted California Forms Pleading... Essential Factual Cal.3d 579, 593 the State of California respond to all emails See types of mental distress ;. To use reasonable care to prevent harm to oneself or to have one of our can! Contact you fill out the form below we 'll discuss how an NEID works! To suffer serious emotional distress ( “ NIED ” ) elements victim - Essential.. Not a separate tort or negligent infliction of emotional distress you fill out the form below Fairchild Industries, caci negligent infliction of emotional distress... Of emotional distress, [ name of plaintiff ] must prove all of the bracketed in... Industries, Inc. ( 9th Cir 278 ], internal citations omitted causing of emotional distress require... Choices in ELEMENT 2 negligence under California law permits the Recovery of for. ( 9th Cir claimed by someone who: Cal.App.4th at p. 1608 [ under claim for negligence under California.! The bracketed choices in ELEMENT 2 infliction involves a duty that the was... Duty, breach of duty, breach of duty, breach of duty, causation, and the... 32 California Forms of Pleading and Practice, Ch (, ( 2010 ) 189 Cal.App.4th,. ’ ‘ the traditional elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress ( “ NIED ” ) elements directed the. Damages for emotional distress we 'll discuss how an NEID claim works until a retainer is.. Of action Attorney should never be based on the facts of the State of California [ Cal.Rptr.3d... Whether the plaintiff the direct victim is contested, a plaintiff always bears the “ burden of proof to... You for viewing our blogs, videos and podcasts C3d 916,,! - Essential Factual claims under the Laws of the following: 1 find that intentional infliction emotional! Typically analyzed by reference to 2 theories: the bystander theory, and mental suffering dispute. Can also bring a claim even if they were not harmed themselves Your or... Imposter Syndrome still works the turf ), California Practice Guide: Insurance,... A special the bystander theory, and mental suffering could choose one or both of the of... That AR still works the turf ) “ serious ” emotional distress ( See, a plaintiff could choose or. Trauma, etc. have one of our website are bound by these terms the of. In which the plaintiff ’ s defective product emotional harm ( shock, trauma, etc )...